AI

AI that earns
its place in the product

We build AI-native by default. The model takes the first pass, our senior team reviews it, decides and owns the result. Start with an independent strategy read, or go straight to a build.

Trusted by:
Bookster Shepherd Planable Omniconvert Salt & Pepper Bookr OPEN

How an AI engagement runs

Evaluation comes before the demo. If a feature can’t be measured, we’ll say so instead of shipping it on vibes.

1

Find the case worth doing

A week looking at where your time and money actually go. Most of the value is in ruling things out. The shortlist usually gets shorter.

2

Build the evaluation set first

Real inputs with known correct answers, agreed with the people doing the work today. Without it, nobody can tell an improvement from a regression.

3

Prototype against it

A working version, measured on your own data rather than a benchmark. You see the score, the failure cases and the running cost before you commit.

4

Harden it

Guardrails, fallbacks, rate limits, audit logging and a cost ceiling. It’s the part that separates a demo from something you can put in front of customers.

5

Ship with a person in the loop

Start with someone reviewing the output, then relax that as the numbers earn your trust. Nothing goes fully autonomous on day one.

What AI-native actually changes

Not what you get. How fast you get it, and what it costs.

Let’s talk

You see it sooner

The first pass is generated, so you have something to react to in days instead of waiting out a design phase you paid for in the dark.

Seniors still decide

Every generated line is reviewed by the engineer whose name is on it. The model drafts. A person is accountable.

Measured, not claimed

Every AI feature ships with an evaluation set and a cost ceiling, so “it got better” is a number instead of an opinion.

Your data stays yours

Gateways, retention controls and access rules, all agreed before the first call to a model provider.

The engineering behind it

A straight answer: our AI projects are recent and mostly under NDA, so the case studies below are engineering work rather than AI work. They’re what the AI practice sits on. The data, integration and platform problems that decide whether an AI feature is even possible.

See more projects
7Ways into
the AI work
31Projects
shipped
38Client reviews
on Clutch
4ISO
certifications

The choices that decide the outcome

AI projects fail in fairly predictable ways. These four decisions settle most of it.

Build or buy

An off-the-shelf tool is often the right answer.If a product already does 80% of it for a monthly fee, we’ll tell you to buy it. We’d rather integrate a tool that exists than sell you a build you didn’t need.

Model choice

Frontier, small, open-weight or self-hosted.It comes down to latency, cost per call and where your data is allowed to go, not which model is in the news that week. Most production systems end up mixing two.

Retrieval

Keyword, vector, hybrid or re-ranked.For anything answering from your own content, retrieval quality matters far more than the model does. Hybrid search plus re-ranking is where most of the gain sits.

Autonomy

Suggest, review, or act.How much the system is allowed to do on its own. We start at suggest, and move up only when the numbers justify it.

Got an idea? Let’s make it real.

Tell us the short version

This could be the first step towards a new and successful collaboration. A one-line idea and a finished spec are both fine — tell us the problem, the deadline you’re working to and what’s in your way.

We reply within one working day.

Prefer another way to talk?

Frequently asked questions

If a product already does 80% of it for a monthly fee, we will tell you to buy it and do the integration work around it instead of selling you a build you did not need.

It depends on latency, cost per call and where your data is allowed to go. Frontier, small, open-weight or self-hosted are all on the table. Most production systems end up combining two.

Every engagement starts by building an evaluation set of real inputs with known correct answers, agreed with the people doing the work today. Improvements are measured against it rather than demonstrated.

Only under rules agreed before the first call. Gateways, retention controls and access rules are set up during the build, and self-hosted options exist where the data cannot leave.

Not on day one. We start with a person reviewing the output and relax that only as the evaluation numbers justify it.