React Native app development services
React Native ships iOS and Android from one codebase with genuinely native components underneath. For products where the two apps do the same job, it removes an entire parallel workstream.
Where we use React Native
React Native is part of the stack on these 2 services. Each page covers how we work, what you get and what it costs to start.
React Native in practice
React Native renders real platform components from React code. A list is a native list, a text input is a native text input, and scrolling behaves the way the operating system intends — which is the difference between an app users accept and one they describe as feeling like a website.
The honest limits are worth stating. Heavy graphics, sustained background processing and brand-new platform APIs are where you drop into native modules, and that is a supported path rather than a failure. Most products never reach those limits; the ones that do usually hit them in one screen, not across the whole app.
What we build with React Native
Apps where iOS and Android share features and the cost of maintaining two codebases is not justified.
Mobile clients for an existing web product, reusing the team, the API knowledge and often the state logic.
Cross-platform apps that still need a native module for a specific SDK — a supported path rather than a workaround.
Is React Native right for you?
Ask usA good fit when
- iOS and Android should do the same job and feature parity matters
- You already have React developers and want to use that skill on mobile
- The app is a companion to an existing web product and shares its API and logic
- Budget favours one codebase over two parallel native teams
Probably not when
- The app is graphics-heavy — games, AR, real-time video processing
- You need new iOS or Android APIs the day they ship
- Only one platform is in scope and will stay that way
- Deep, continuous background work is central to the product
What we run alongside React Native
The rest of the setup, and why each piece is there. We keep this list short on purpose — every dependency is something someone has to maintain.
- Expo
- The default starting point now. Builds, updates and native modules without owning the toolchain from day one.
- React Navigation
- Navigation that respects platform conventions rather than inventing its own.
- TanStack Query
- Server state, caching and offline behaviour — the part most mobile apps get wrong first.
- Reanimated
- Animation on the UI thread, which is what keeps gestures smooth under load.
- Detox or Maestro
- End-to-end tests on real devices, run before a release rather than after a bad review.
- Sentry
- Crash reporting with release tracking, because store reviews are a slow way to learn about a crash.
Why React Native
Let’s talkOne team, two platforms
Feature parity is the default rather than a coordination problem between two separate app teams.
Real native components
The UI renders with platform components, so lists, scrolling and inputs behave the way users expect.
React skills transfer directly
A web React team is productive on mobile quickly, which changes the staffing maths on a small product.
What we get called in to fix
Get a second opinionLists that stutter
Long lists rendering every row, or images loaded at full resolution into small cells. Both show immediately on mid-range Android hardware.
Navigation state chaos
Screens re-mounting and losing state on every tab change, usually a navigator structure problem rather than a React one.
Bridge-heavy animation
Animation driven from JavaScript that drops frames under load. Moving it to Reanimated fixes it properly.
Neglected native layers
Projects that never updated their iOS and Android build configuration, until a store requirement makes it urgent.
React Native or the alternative
The comparisons we are actually asked to make, answered the way we would answer them on a call.
React Native uses native components and existing React skills. Flutter draws its own UI and gives pixel-identical results. Brand-led design: Flutter. Existing React team and platform feel: React Native.
Native wins on hardware access, graphics and day-one API support. React Native wins on cost and feature parity. Most business apps sit clearly on the second side.
Expo unless you know you need something it does not support. The bare workflow means owning two native toolchains — a real, recurring cost.
React Native works well with:
Got an idea? Let’s make it real.
Tell us the short version
This could be the first step towards a new and successful collaboration. A one-line idea and a finished spec are both fine — tell us the problem, the deadline you’re working to and what’s in your way.
Keep looking
Frequently asked questions
React Native when you already have React people and want native components. Flutter when pixel-consistent UI across platforms matters more.
Yes. The limits show up in heavy graphics and some hardware-intensive work — where we drop to a native module.
If built properly, yes. Most complaints about cross-platform apps trace back to navigation and list performance, both solvable.
If it is built properly, no. Complaints almost always trace to list performance, navigation feel or animation — all fixable, and all decided by how it was built.
Yes. Native modules are a normal part of the model, so one demanding feature does not compromise the whole approach.